HISTORY OF BUCKS COUNTY.
CHAPTER III
THE NEW REGIME
Page 146
vincial authorities Pennsylvania became a neutral zone over which the
hereditary foes travelled in quest of trophies. Neither of these
antagonists fully respected the neutrality of tbe Delawares, and thus
beset on all aides these tribes began to meditate a revenge which would
have involved the savages along the whole border. The settlements could
not fail to suffer in such a contest, which eventually might have been
directed chiefly against them, and the governors of Virginia,, Maryland,
Pennsylvania, and New York spared no effort to avert the threatened
danger. Among the earliest measures on the part of Pennsylvania was an
effort to allay the dissatisfaction of the Indians in regard to the
concessions of land already made. The representatives of the Delawares
and the agents of the province met; “divers deeds of sale under the
hands and seals of former kings and chiefs of the Delaware Indians,
their ancestors and predecessors,” were exhibited and read, and
expressing themselves “satisfied and content” with these, Sassoonan,
Opekasset, and five others executed a deed of release for all the lands
between the Delaware and the Susquehanna, “ from Duck creek to the
mountains on this side Lechay.”
This was consummated on the 17th of September, 1718. It will be
observed that no new lands were sought or granted, but the several
unmeasured grants which had so long disturbed t,he Indians were defined
by one general line, and the unsettled question of their extent set at
rest by a certain natural boundary which it was hoped could not be
mistaken. This pleasant illusion was soon dispelled. The settlers
maintaining the authority of the original treaby lines, or ignoring all
alike, pushed their improvements beyond the line of l’i18, to the great
dissatisfaction of the natives. Their most influential chiefs
remonstrated with the proprietary government, isolated cases of
hostility ensued, and the prospect of a general war appeared imminent,
when wiser counsels pre- ’ vailed. While the new line seemed well
understood on the Delaware, on the Schuylkill “ the mountains this side
Lechay” were confounded with the IGtt#atinny range, and settlers had
planted themselves at Tulpehocken and Oley.
Of this Sassoonan complained with pathetic eloquence at a treaty held
in 1728 at Philadelphia. Addressing James Logan, the proprietary
secretary, and one of the commissioners for land affairs, he said “ that
he was grown old, and was troubled to see the Christians set$le on lands
that the Indians had never \ been paid for ; that the Christians made
their settlements very near them, and they would have no place of their
own to live on; that this might occasion a difference between their
children hereafter, and he would willingly prevent any misunderstanding
that might happen.” In reply Logan said “ that he was no otherwise
concerned in the lands of the province, than as he was entrusted with
other commissioners by the proprietor to manage his affairs of property
in his absence ; that William Penn had made .it a rule never to suffer
any lands to be settled by his people till they were first purchased of
the Indians; that his commissioners had followed the same rule, and how
little reason there was for
147 Picture
148 Map
Page 149
any complaint against him or the commissioners he would make appear.”
He recited the release of 1718, which the chiefs present acknowledged to
be correct, but pointed out that the boundary line described ‘( reached
no farther than a few miles beyond Oley, but that their lands on
Tulpyhockin were seated by the Christians.” To this Logan assented so
far as his knowledge went, but whether the lands mentioned were within
or without the boundary of the treaty, “ he well knew that the Indians
some’ few years since were seated on them, and that he, with the other
commissioners, would never consent that any settlement should be made on
lands where the Indians were seated ; that these lands were settled
wholly against their minds and even without their knowledge ; but he .
desired of. the Indians that though these people had seated themselves
on Tulpyhockin lands without the commissioners’ leave or consent, yet
that they would not offer them any violence or injure them, but wait
till such time as that the matter could be adjusted.”
The truth was that the province had outgrown the tutelage of Penn.
The border was chiefly occupied by men whose respect for the rights of
the heathen Indian was only less than that in which they held the
peculiar religious tenets of the founder and early colonists of the
province, and who trampled on the rights of either with equal unconcern.
The founder of the province was now dead, and his successors were less
conscientious in the discharge of the high moral responsibilities
imposed upon them as governors and proprietors. The new element
gradually came into power, and while some of those associated with the
first administration were still in office a large part of their
influence had departed. The somewhat autocratic form of government in
the hands of an unworthy ruler began to show its evil results, and the
relief suggested by Logan in 1728 was deferred until the intrigues of
the French with the disaffected Indians rendered delay no longer safe.
In a letter to James Steel, under date of November 18,1729, James
Logan wrote : "It is now not only Sassoonan, our very good friend, and
his people of our Indians, that we have to deal with, but the lands also
on the Delaware above Tohickon creek must be purchased of others. But
the main business of all is to induce John Penn himself to come over.
The Indians all expect him next spring, everybody expects him, and it is
in vain for him to expect that others will do his business for him.”
Penn did not come, however. The Indian complaints continued, and rumors
that the French were secretly encouraging the disaffection led the
assembly in 1731 to urge the governor to take such measures ‘( that the
Indians might be made easy respecting their lands.” In reply the
governor said that their concern was prudent and just; that the matter
had been delayed so long solely in expectation of the arrival of some of
the proprietors ; “ but as I am assured the gentlemen now in trust for
them have all possible zeal and affection for the peace and true
interest of the country, it is not to be questioned but that, convinced
by the necessity of it,
Page 146
vincial authorities Pennsylvania became a neutral zone over which the
hereditary foes travelled in quest of trophies. Neither of these antagonists
fully respected the neutrality of the Delawares, and thus beset on all aides
these tribes began to meditate a revenge which would have involved the
savages along the whole border. The settlements could not fail to suffer in
such a contest, which eventually might have been directed chiefly against
them, and the governors of Virginia,, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York
spared no effort to avert the threatened danger. Among the earliest measures
on the part of Pennsylvania was an effort to allay the dissatisfaction of
the Indians in regard to the concessions of land already made. The
representatives of the Delawares and the agents of the province met; “divers
deeds of sale under the hands and seals of former kings and chiefs of the
Delaware Indians, their ancestors and predecessors,” were exhibited and
read, and expressing themselves “satisfied and content” with these,
Sassoonan, Opekasset, and five others executed a deed of release for all the
lands between the Delaware and the Susquehanna, “ from Duck creek to the
mountains on this side Lechay.”
This was consummated on the 17th of September, 1718. It will be observed
that no new lands were sought or granted, but the several unmeasured grants
which had so long disturbed the Indians were defined by one general line,
and the unsettled question of their extent set at rest by a certain natural
boundary which it was hoped could not be mistaken. This pleasant illusion
was soon dispelled. The settlers maintaining the authority of the original
treaty lines, or ignoring all alike, pushed their improvements beyond the
line of l718, to the great dissatisfaction of the natives. Their most
influential chiefs remonstrated with the proprietary government, isolated
cases of hostility ensued, and the prospect of a general war appeared
imminent, when wiser counsels prevailed. While the new line seemed well
understood on the Delaware, on the Schuylkill “ the mountains this side
Lechay” were confounded with the Kittatinny range, and settlers had planted
themselves at Tulpehocken and Oley.
Of this Sassoonan complained with pathetic eloquence at a treaty held in
1728 at Philadelphia. Addressing James Logan, the proprietary secretary, and
one of the commissioners for land affairs, he said “ that he was grown old,
and was troubled to see the Christians settle on lands that the Indians had
never been paid for ; that the Christians made their settlements very near
them, and they would have no place of their own to live on; that this might
occasion a difference between their children hereafter, and he would
willingly prevent any misunderstanding that might happen.” In reply Logan
said “ that he was no otherwise concerned in the lands of the province, than
as he was entrusted with other commissioners by the proprietor to manage his
affairs of property in his absence ; that William Penn had made .it a rule
never to suffer any lands to be settled by his people till they were first
purchased of the Indians; that his commissioners had followed the same rule,
and how little reason there was for
Page 147 Picture Rich, Benjamin S.
Page 148 Outline Map of Bucks County
Page 149
any complaint against him or the commissioners he would make appear.” He
recited the release of 1718, which the chiefs present acknowledged to be
correct, but pointed out that the boundary line described "reached no
farther than a few miles beyond Oley, but that their lands on Tulpehocken
were seated by the Christians.” To this Logan assented so far as his
knowledge went, but whether the lands mentioned were within or without the
boundary of the treaty, “ he well knew that the Indians some few years since
were seated on them, and that he, with the other commissioners, would never
consent that any settlement should be made on lands where the Indians were
seated ; that these lands were settled wholly against their minds and even
without their knowledge ; but he . desired of. the Indians that though these
people had seated themselves on Tulpehocken lands without the commissioners’
leave or consent, yet that they would not offer them any violence or injure
them, but wait till such time as that the matter could be adjusted.”
The truth was that the province had outgrown the tutelage of Penn. The
border was chiefly occupied by men whose respect for the rights of the
heathen Indian was only less than that in which they held the peculiar
religious tenets of the founder and early colonists of the province, and who
trampled on the rights of either with equal unconcern. The founder of the
province was now dead, and his successors were less conscientious in the
discharge of the high moral responsibilities imposed upon them as governors
and proprietors. The new element gradually came into power, and while some
of those associated with the first administration were still in office a
large part of their influence had departed. The somewhat autocratic form of
government in the hands of an unworthy ruler began to show its evil results,
and the relief suggested by Logan in 1728 was deferred until the intrigues
of the French with the disaffected Indians rendered delay no longer safe.
In a letter to James Steel, under date of November 18,1729, James Logan
wrote : "It is now not only Sassoonan, our very good friend, and his people
of our Indians, that we have to deal with, but the lands also on the
Delaware above Tohickon creek must be purchased of others. But the main
business of all is to induce John Penn himself to come over. The Indians all
expect him next spring, everybody expects him, and it is in vain for him to
expect that others will do his business for him.” Penn did not come,
however. The Indian complaints continued, and rumors that the French were
secretly encouraging the disaffection led the assembly in 1731 to urge the
governor to take such measures "that the Indians might be made easy
respecting their lands.” In reply the governor said that their concern was
prudent and just; that the matter had been delayed so long solely in
expectation of the arrival of some of the proprietors ; “ but as I am
assured the gentlemen now in trust for them have all possible zeal and
affection for the peace and true interest of the country, it is not to be
questioned but that, convinced by the necessity of it,
Page 150
they will proceed to the utmost length of the powers they are invested
with so far as they can with any safety to themselves, to answer your and my
request in so important an affair.” The commissioners of property were
apparently unwilling to assume responsibilities not authorized by the
proprietors, and on the 13th of November united in an urgent petition
addressed to John, Thomas, and Richard Penn, in which they say : “We have
divers times jointly, but we suppose James Logan oftener, represented to you
the state of this province and the necessity there appeared that one of you
should hasten over as well to settle your affairs of property as to enter
treaties and to take measures with the native Indians for continuing that
peace and good understanding with them, and these representations we hoped
would have had the desired effect. But your coming being from time to time
deferred we thought it proper that James Steel, now two years ago, should
take a voyage over in order more earnestly to press and if possible prevail
with you to resolve on it without more delay, and on the account he gave us
at his return we fully depended on seeing Thomas the same fall, but with the
following spring and another fall are all passed away without now giving us
much more hopes of what has been so long expected as three or four years
ago. But a treaty we must have with them if possible if we would expect to
continue in any manner of safety.” John Penn came in August, 1732, and in
the following month the long-deferred claims of the Indians were adjusted by
the purchase of the lands unwarrantably occupied by the settlers. “ But at
the same time the Indians were satisfied on the one hand, they were injured
on the other. While they were paid for their lands on the Tulpehocken, they
were very unjustly and in a manner forcibly dispossessed of their lands in
the forks of the Delaware.”
In his will Penn left to his grandson and namesake a tract of ten
thousand acres of land to be laid out by his trustees. In the discharge of
this trust the . commissioners of property fixed upon the Minisinks for the
location of a part of this tract, and by a warrant dated November 20,1727,
authorized the surveyor- general of the province to lay it out. The region
selected lay on the west side of the Delaware river, extending from the
Kittatinny range to the Alleghenies. Here some two or three thousand acres
of rich alluvial bottoms, inclosed by the broken foothills and a mountainous
spur, which nearly connected the two ranges, had early attracted the
attention of the thrifty Dutch adventurers, and at this time, if cleared of
the Indian title, would readily bring sixty or seventy pounds per one
hundred acres. But the natives set even a higher estimate upon these lands,
and from the earliest knowledge of them steadfastly refused to grant any
concessions to the whites. The surveyor-general apparently met with no
better success, for although provided with “four of the best strowds, blue
and red, for a present” he accomplished nothing. “ The Indians would suffer.
no manner of survey to be made there on any account whatsoever.”
Page 151
In his report of the matter to John Penn, Logan accounts for this result
by the fact that “there never was any pretence of a purchase made on thy
father’s account within thirty miles of the nearest of these Indian
settlements,” and evidently indicated that the trustees saw no immediate
prospect of overcoming the difficulty. In the succeeding year, therefore,
William Penn, Jr., sold his grant to William Allen, a gentleman more noted
for his large and successful speculations in proprietary lands than for his
conscientious regard for the rights of the aboriginal owners. It is not
certain how soon he succeeded in locating this tract in the coveted region,
but the records of Bucks county show that in 1733 he sold to Nicholas Dupue
three hundred and three acres, which were a part of this tract, and included
the “ Great Shawna island,” and probably “ Shawna Town,” in the Minisinks.
It is probable that the whole tract was located somewhat prior to this date
in different places above the Kittatinny range on lands which had not yet
been released by the savages. Other grants were made in this region, but,
with the understanding that the land should be surveyed when cleared of the
Indian title, and if this condition had been scrupulously complied with no
ill consequences would have arisen from the practice. To most persons the
property thus handicapped proved unmarketable, and Allen appears to have
found it a profitable business to purchase these lands, which he apparently
found no difficulty in selling to actual settlers, to whom he gave a
warrantee deed. In this way the Indians found their most ’ highly prized
hunting-grounds invaded by an adventurous set of purchasers, who were
considerably reinforced by a class of squatters who ignored the rights of
the natives and the land regulations of the province alike.
On the 12th of July, 1735, the proprietors published a scheme of a
lottery, in which they, “ having considered a proposal made to them for the
sale of one hundred thousand acres of land, by way of lottery, and finding
that the same tends to cultivate and improve the lands, and consequently
increase the trade and riches of this province ; and also considering that
many families are, through inadvertency, settled on lands to which they have
no right, but by becoming adventurers in such lottery may have an
opportunity of securing those lands and settlements at an easy rate, to
themselves and their posterity,” proposed the sale of 7750 tickets at forty
shillings each, of which 6157 should * be blanks, and the remainder drawing
from twenty-five to three thousand acres each. On these lands the quit-rent
was reduced from the common rate of four shillings and two pence per one
hundred acres to one shilling, and the successful drawer permitted to lay
out, his land “ anywhere within the province, except on manors, lands
already surveyed or agreed for with the proprietors, or their agents, or
that had been actually settled and improved before the date of these
proposals, provided, nevertheless, that such persons who are settled on
lands without warrants for the same and may be entitled to prizes, either by
becoming adventurers themselves, or by purchasing prize tickets, may have
liberty to lay
Page 152
their rights on the lands where they are so seated.” In addition to this
premium to aggressors upon Indian lands, it was further provided that “
whereas several of the adventurers may be unacquainted with proper places
whereon to locate the prizes they have been entitled to, several tracts of
the best vacant lands shall be laid out and divided into lots for all prizes
not less than two hundred acres.” In accordance with the last provision
lands were laid out in the forks of the Delaware, and thus this iniquitous
measure not only stimulated the reckless invasion of Indian lands by
individual adventurers; but led to a similar wholesale violation of Indian
rights, under the sanction of the proprietors. The lottery did not readily
fill, and no drawings were ever made ; but so many tickets as were sold
became valid claims to lands, which led to the rapid settlement of the lots
laid out in the forks of the Delaware.
These bold aggressions at once called forth loud complaints from the
Indians. The fears they had long entertained now appeared about to be
realized, and as redress was delayed their complaints took on a threatening
tone. Efforts were made by the provincial authorities to compose these
clamors, and several conferences were held by the proprietor and delegates
of the complaining tribes, but there was no room for compromise, and matters
were steadily growing worse, when the arrival of deputies of the Five
Nations suggested another method. These Indians had never fully acquiesced
in the Dungan purchase, and continued to claim a right in the Susquehanna
lands, but in the summer of 1735 it was resolved in a general council of the
confederation to make a conclusion of all disputes on this point, and to
this end sent twenty-three deputies in the fall of 1736 to negotiate with
the Pennsylvania proprietor. In the compact completed October 11, 1736,
these facts are cited, and a grant made of all the Susquehanna river with
the lands lying on both sides of it, “to extend eastward as far as the heads
of the branches or springs which run into the said Susquehanna.” The lands
on the west side were to extend to the setting sun, and on both sides to
extend from the mouth of the river to the Kittatinny range. It is known that
some complaint was made to them of the clamorous Delawares, but the record
of the treaty is too meagre to learn the exact character of the
representation, and nothing apparently was accomplished at this meeting to
adjust the difficulty with the fork tribes. The lands granted did not affect
the question at issue about the territory within the forks, and other means
were taken to effect the end desired by the unscrupulous proprietor.
Conrad Weiser was a prominent figure in this negotiation. By a long
residence with the Mohawks he had gained great influence with the whole
confederation, and it is probable that he exerted it with great effect in
the interest of the proprietor’s project. It was therefore reserved to him
in the obscurity of his frontier home to correct the fatal omission of the
above-mentioned deed. The deputation of Indians returned from Philadelphia
by way of Tulpehocken, where Weiser had a station, and remained with him
several days. Here, on
Page 153
the 25th of October, the deputies executed a document in which they say
that their “true intent and meaning,” in the deed of the 11th instant, was
to release all the lands within the boundaries of Pennsylvania, “beginning
eastward on the river Delaware, as far northward. as the said ridge of
endless mountains as they cross the country of Pennsylvania from the
eastward to the west.” The circumstances under which this document was given
greatly weakens its force, and at best, unless the most extravagant right of
conquest be conceded to the Iroquois, it was only a release of their assumed
proprietorship of the lands conquered, and was of no avail against the
rights of the Delaware. However, armed with this concession the proprietor
sought a meeting with the Delawares in the succeeding summer.
Some time in 1731, John and Thomas Penn met a delegation of the forks
tribes, headed by Tishekunk and Nutimus, at Durham, "not only for the
renewal of friendship with the people, but likewise to adjust some matters
relating to lands lying in the county of Bucks.” Little that was definite
was accomplished at this meeting, but in the next spring these chiefs, with
Lappawinzoe and other deputies, came to Pennsbury to meet the remaining
proprietor. At this conference the various prior treaties were examined, and
especially that of 1686, but of this the deputies appeared to have no
knowledge, and the meeting was terminated to allow the chiefs to consult
some of their old men who were absent. And now after the lapse of two years,
and after the proposed consultation with those more likely to know of the
early transactions, these chiefs, with “ Monokyhickan and several other old
men,” came to Philadelphia to conclude the business begun some three years
before.
This meeting occurred on August 24, 1737. The events noted above were
stated by Thomas Penn and the early deeds read to the assemblage of Indians
and councilmen. All this the Indians confirmed as correct and acknowledged
the treaty of 1682 to be true, but the natives manifesting some hesitation
as to the other deed of 1686, “ the same was not only read and fully
interpreted to them, but likewise the deposition of Joseph Wood, who was
present at the said sale, and who signed it as a witness to the deed, and
likewise the deposition of William Biles, who was present at this
transaction, and remembered well all that then passed.” At this point in the
proceedings the Indians asked an adjournment of the sitting till afternoon
to consider the matter. On coming together again the Indians said they did
not fully understand how the lines mentioned in the deed were to run,
whereupon a draft was made and explained to them. In regard to this draft a
gentleman who has given the matter much study says:--* It was our good
fortune to find this very draft among the papers of Thomas Penn, by which he
attempted to explain to the Indians the proper course of the walk. Any one
can
* See Pennsylvania Archives, vol. i. p. 529 et seq.
Page 154
readily see, on inspecting and comparing it with our present maps, that
it was purposely gotten up to deceive. It is a rude affair, on which the
Delaware is represented from the mouth of the Neshaminy to the Lehigh river.
The forks of the Neshaminy are placed considerably more than half-way
towards the Lehigh, when in reality they do not nearly approach half this
distance. The “ spruce tree P” is marked on the Delaware a short distance
above the “ Great Creek Mackerick-hitton,” from the head of which a line is
made westward to the Neshaminy, and serves as a base from the middle of
which another line is represented nearly due north with the Lehigh and no
further, and “The supposed day-and-a-half’s journey into ye woods.” The
deception lies in making this line exactly parallel with the Delaware,
and not representing it any farther to the north or northwest.*
The Indians did not discover these inaccuracies, and upon considering all
that they had heard touching the said deed, and now seeing the lines in it
laid down, they expressed themselves convinced of the truth thereof, and
that they had no objection, but were willing to join in a full and absolute
confirmation of the said sale, but at the same time requested that they
might be permitted to remain on their present settlements and plantations,
although within that purchase, unmolested. In answer to this request the
proprietor repeated his assurances given them at Pennsbury and reaffirmed
them.
This ended the proceedings of the day, and on the following, the 25th of
August, the treaty was consummated by a document in which the events
recounted above are briefly recited and the promised u full and absolute
confirmation” of the deed of 1686 given. The limits of the tract thus
conveyed are described as follows : “ Beginning on a line drawn from a
certain spruce tree on the river Delaware by a west-northwest course to
Neshaminy creek ; from thence back into the woods as far as a man can go in
a day and a half, and bounded in the west by Neshaminy or the most westerly
branch thereof, so far as the said branch doth extend, and from thence by a
line to the utmost extent of the day-and-a-half ‘s walk ; and from thence to
the aforesaid River Delaware ; and so down the courses of the river to the
first mentioned spruce tree.” To this was added an agreement “ that the
extent of the said tract or tracts of land shall be forthwith walked,
travelled, or gone over by proper persons to be appointed for that purpose,
according to the direction of the aforesaid deed.Ҡ
* History of the Indian Walk, by William J. Buck, Philadelphia, 1886, p.
79.
† Appended to a copy of this deed in one of his note-books, John
Watson has the following notes :-
1. Makerick-kitton. The creek formerly called Baker's creek, now. known
by the name of Great creek, the longest and most southerly branch whereof is
thought to have been called Towsisnick--this branch heads in Jos. Hamton's
land.
2. This course, W. N. W., is supposed would never touch Neshaminy creek,
and as there are persons of veracity now living who have heard John Penquite,
lately deceased, say that he well remembered to have seen, when he was a
lad, a line of marked trees crossing his father's land, to Neshaminy creek,
-which he also well remembered to have heard the
Page 155
There is abundant evidence of sharp practice on the part of Thomas Penn
in the negotiations which have just been described. The urging of the
“walking purchase” at all is indefensible in view of the treaty of 1718, in
which, after an examination of the different previous grants, all former
concessions were merged into the one which established the northern limit at
“the mountains on this side Lechay.” But aside from this consideration,
granting that the treaty of 1737 was made with tribes acknowledged to be
independent of Sassoonan and competent to grant territory on the Delaware
above this limit as well as to release the territory below it, the evidence
is unmistakable that they totally misapprehended the possible scope of the
deed they confirmed. Penn, however, labored under no such error. The draft
submitted to the Indians was drawn with the deliberate intention to deceive
them, and the purpose to seize the land in the forks of the Delaware by
means of this deed was conceived as early as 1734 and intelligently pursued
to the end.
The uncompromising attitude of the forks Indians, together with the
stubborn, undisciplined character of the white aggressors, too many of whom
had been invited into the region by the unwise if not unlawful action of the
proprietors, presented a question of difficult solution even to one
honorably disposed. It was thought by some that a liberal payment made to
the natives would induce them under the circumstances to relinquish their
lands, but this policy did not accord with the penurious disposition of
Thomas Penn and the exacting business dealings of William Allen, and so the
open, honorable course was rejected for one of trickery and subterfuge.
The proprietors met the representatives of the forks tribes at Durham, in
October, 1734, when this subject was broached, and it is probable that they
were quite as desirous as the natives to defer further negotiations until
they could investigate the bearings of the matter more fully. Accordingly,
early in the next spring they set about testing the conditions of the deed
to ascertain whether it could be made to serve their purpose. A trial walk
was ordered; Timothy Smith, sheriff of Bucks county, John Chapman,
deputy-surveyor for the same county, and James Steel, the proprietors'
receiver of rents, were appointed to conduct the business. Steel does not
appear to have gone into the field, but the others, after receiving full
instructions at Philadelphia, were dispatched to the work, Smith in general
charge and Chapman conducting the professional part. The object was to run a
line “back into the woods" by as nearly a straight course as practicable, so
that the final walk might be made with
Indians say was the line between them and Penn, and ordered Penquite to
till the ground on Penn's side of it only, and not to meddle with theirs. It
must therefore be either a mistake in entering the course W. N. W. in the
deed instead of W. S. W., which pretty nearly agrees with the line of marked
trees aforesaid, or otherwise being without a compass they set the course by
estimation, to the white-oak corner, which seems most likely to have been
the case.
Page 156
the least hindrance and cover the greatest distance possible. Chapman’s
notes of his survey have been preserved in one of John Watson’s books, from
which Mr. Buck (Walking Purchase, p. 56) marks out the following course :
“From Wrightstown to Plumstead is nine or ten miles, from the latter place
to the head branch of Perkiomen 8 miles, to Stokes’ meadow 4 miles, and to
the ‘West Branch’ or Lehigh river 17 miles, making from Wrightstown to the
Lehigh, 39 miles, and to Lehigh gap of the Blue mountains a total of 48 3/4
miles. These facts prove that this route was laid through Bedminister
township near the present village of Strawntown, keeping west of the
Haycock, or it would not have passed over the head of Perkiomen and through
Stokes’ meadow, which was the place lately owned and occupied by General
Paul Applebach. By comparing the line of this route with late maps it will
be found on a pretty direct course towards the Lehigh gap.”
This line was begun on the 22d of April, and finished on the 2d of May,
1735, but in the mean time the proprietors became anxious to know the
results of the experiment, and instructed James Steel to make inquiry.
Accordingly, on the 25th of April he addressed a letter to Smith, in which
he says:
The proprietaries are impatient to know what progress is made in
travelling over the land that is to be settled in the ensuing treaty that is
to be held with the Indians at Pennsbury the fifth of the next month, and,
therefore, I now desire thee, without delay, to send down an account of what
has been done in that affair, and if anything is omitted or neglected which
should have been pursued, the same may be yet performed before the intended
time of meeting the Indians. Pray fail not of doing everything. that was
proposed to thyself and John Chapman, at Philadelphia, that no
disappointment may be the means of delay in the business of the treaty.
Again on the following day he addresses a letter to both of the persons
in charge of the business :
The proprietors are very much concerned that so much time hath been lost
before you begun the work recommended so earnestly to you at your leaving
Philadelphia, and it being so very short before the meeting at Pennsbury,
the fifth of the next month, that they now desire that upon the return of
Joseph Deane, he, together with two other persons who can travel well,
should be immediately sent on foot the day-and-half journey, and two others
on horseback to carry necessary provisions for them and to assist them in
their return home. The time is now so far spent that not one moment is to be
lost ; and as soon as they have travelled the day-and-a-half journey, the
proprietaries desire that a messenger be sent to give them account, without
delay, how far that day-and-a-half travelling will reach up into the
country. Pray use your utmost diligence, and let nothing be wanting to be
done on this most important occasion, which will give great satisfaction to
the proprietaries, who will generously reward you and those you employ, for
your care and trouble.*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The Steel letters with much other information upon this topic are
derived from an article published in the Bucks County Intelligencer,
in 1850, by Judge Richard Watson. These letters were obtained at that time
through the courtesy of George Justice, Esq. ; the Steel letter-book is not
now to be found.
Page 157 Photo of Eastburn, Moses
Page 158 blank
Page 159
Edward Marshall and Joseph Doane were two of the three employed* in
accordance with the instructions contained in the last letter, and the trial
walk was made some time in the early part of May. As the meeting at
Pennsbury did not occur until the ninth, it is possible that it was delayed
until a report of the result of the trial could be received. How far this
walk reached is uncertain, but as the course was subsequently found marked
by blazed trees some miles beyond the Lehigh gap it is probable that the
walkers succeeded in passing far beyond the existing treaty limit,
notwithstanding much of the route led “ through a very rocky, broken way.”
The result demonstrated that the deed could be made to serve the purpose of
the proprietors, and the negotiations with the Indians were accordingly
pushed to the conclusion of 1737.
During the two years which elapsed between the negotiations at Pennsbury
and the consummation at Philadelphia, the trial walk was held in abeyance
and escaped the general notice of the public. It is practically certain that
the Indians knew nothing of it, and those who were employed in a subordinate
capacity in running the line, when afterward examined, apparently knew
nothing of the subsequent trial-walk. And it is quite as certain that very
few, outside of the interested circle of the proprietors and William Allen,
comprehended the motives which led these worthies to lay so much stress upon
the confirmation of this deed. But they did not enter into the
project without a close calculation of all the chances, and so well had
these calculations been made that Thomas Penn could write to his brothers in
England on October 11, 1737 : "Since I wrote you last, at no very great
expense concluded with the Delaware Indians on the foot of the agreement of
1686, which though done to their satisfaction takes in as much ground as any
person here expected.”
Two days after the signing of the treaty of 1737, agreeing that the walk
should be made forthwith, James Steel wrote Timothy Smith as follows : "The
treaty with the Indians which was begun at Durham, and afterward held at
Pennsbury, is now finished at Philadelphia, and the time appointed for
walking over the land, it is to be the 12th of September next, and for that
purpose our proprietary would request thee to speak to that man of the three
which travelled and held out the best when they walked over the land before,
to attend to that
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Moses Marshall, son of the walker, stated to John Watson "that in the
year 1734 notice was given in the public papers, that the remaining
day-and-a-half’s walk was to be made, and offering 500 acres of land,
anywhere in the purchase, and £5 in money, to the person who should attend,
and walk the farthest in the given time." After a careful examination of the
only papers published in Philadelphia at the time, Mr. Buck was unable to
verify the statement, and if any such publication was made at any time it
was probably done by posting notices in the usual public places. This could
only refer, however, to the trial walk, as the selections for the final walk
were made by the proprietors before time for any such advertising had
passed, and the little knowledge of the first walk which got abroad
discourages the idea that any considerable advertising of the matter was
made. The offer of reward was probably made through Smith privately.
Page 160
service at the time mentioned, when Solomon Jennings is expected to join
and travel the day and a half with him. Thou art also requested to accompany
them, and to provide such provisions for those men as may be needful on the
occasion desired. John Chapman also to go along with you and be sure to
choose the best ground and shortest way that can be found. The Indians
intend that two or three of their young men shall be present, and see the
land fairly walked over.” Smith and Chapman at once proceeded to go over and
critically examine the route laid out something more than two years before.
This was found as nearly straight as the character of the country would
permit, but as it led over the mountains and through a very rocky, broken
way, which Smith conceived could not answer, he advised that in going the
walk the walkers should keep the great road and old paths as much as might
be. The “great road” or the “great Durham road,” as it was variously called,
had been opened nearly five years before as far up as the Tohickon creek
“near where the Deep run empties into it,” and from this point a rough wagon
trail now led up to the iron furnace in Durham. It was decided, therefore,
that the route of the proposed walk should be “up the Durham road to the
present village of Stony Point, in Springfield township ; thence by the
present villages of Bursonville and Springtown, striking the Lehigh river a
short distance below Bethlehem. *This was undoubtedly a much better
selection, thus entirely avoiding the rocky sections of Haycock,
Springfield, and Saucon. The route of the trial walk must have left the
Durham road at or near the present village of Gardenville, in Plumstead
township, and did not meet it again till a short distance this side of the
Lehigh. For this distance the two routes were parallel to each other for
about twenty miles, and nowhere beyond four and a half miles apart, which
was most likely at the Haycock.” (Walking Purchase, p. 88.)
Edward Marshall and James Yeates, of Newtown, and Solomon Jennings, a
settler very recently located on the Lehigh about two miles above the site
of Bethlehem, were chosen by the proprietors to make the journey. What led
to their selection is not certainly known. Marshall was doubtless “that man
of the three which travelled and held out the best when they walked over the
land before,” and when notified of his appointment “put himself in keeping
according to his best judgment, fully determined to win the prize of five
hundred acres of land or lose his life in the attempt.” It is possible that
Yeates was also engaged in the trial walk; or it may be that both he and
Jennings were suggested to the proprietors as young, athletic hunters inured
to great exertion, and well acquainted with the region to be traversed. The
time set for the walk to begin was the 12th of September, but Smith’s
presence being required at court that day the business was postponed for one
week. Accordingly, before sunrise on the morning of the 19th of September,
1737, a “great number” of spectators and those officially connected with the
undertaking, gathered about “ a chestnut tree near the turning out of the
road from Durham
Page 161
to John Chapman's."* The prominent figures of this company, beside the
chosen pedestrians of the proprietors and the three natives delegated by the
Indians, were Sheriff Smith, who had general charge of the walk; Benjamin
Eastburn, his two deputies, Nicholas Scull and John Chapman, and the nephew
of James Steel, who were to run the line to the Delaware ; Joseph Smith, a
nephew of Smith, and others who were to attend as spectators, or to carry
the “provisions, liquors, and bedding" provided. All who proposed to make
the journey were mounted, save the accompanying Indians and the chosen
walkers, and as the hour of sunrise approached the latter stood with their
hands upon the tree awaiting the start.
Just as the sun touched the horizon the watches of Smith and Scull
pointed precisely to six o'clock and the signal was given. The pedestrians
at once set out, with Marshall somewhat in the rear of the others. Their
course led along the Durham road, which they followed without incident until
Red hill, about two miles beyond the Tohickon, was reached. Here Jennings
and two of the Indians gave out and fell back with the company of
attendants. At Gallows hill the walkers turned off from the great road to a
lesser one, which they travelled until noon, halting for dinner on a branch
of Scook's creek, in meadows belonging to one Wilson, an Indian trader.
After fifteen minutes for refreshment, the walk was resumed along an old
beaten Indian path which led across the Saucon and the Lehigh, where
Bethlehem now stands. The journey was pursued until fifteen minutes past
six, to complete the twelve hours of actual travel, and as they neared the
finish of the first day's walk in the twilight,
* The starting-point, which is variously described in the different
accounts, has given no little trouble to those who have attempted to exactly
locate it. Of those who attended the walk, Thomas Furniss describes it as in
the text ; Edward Marshall as " a chestnut tree in the line of John Chapman,
in Wrightstown ;" Timothy Smith as " a chestnut tree near the Wrightstown
meeting-house ;" John Heider as "a tree within a few rods of Wrightstown
meeting-house ;" Joseph Knowles as "John Chapman's corner at Wrightstown ;"
and according to Mr. Buck (Walking Purchase, p. 101, where the whole matter
is discussed at length) "Benjamin Eastburn places it at the south corner of
John Chapman's (the first settler) tract on the Newtown township line, about
three-quarters of a mile from the east corner of Wrightstown township, and
about the same distance below the meeting-house."
But the deed requires that the starting-point shall be on a line "drawn
from a certain spruce tree on the river Delaware by a west-northwest course
to Neshaminy creek." From notes of John Watson it appears that the spruce
tree stood 140 perches above the mouth of the Great creek--now Knowle's
creek--and that a line drawn west-southwest, as Watson corrects the deed,
would strike the locality where the text and the majority of the accounts
place the chestnut tree. The Bucks County Historical Society, after a
painstaking examination of the evidence bearing on the matter, has fixed
upon a plot of ground in the lower angle formed by the Durham or Newtown
road and the Pennsville road. A committee of the society is now considering
the ways and means for erecting a permanent memorial upon this spot to mark
the kite of the famous chestnut tree. The ground for the purpose was
contributed by Mary Chapman.
Page 162
Smith held his watch in his hand counting off the remaining minutes and
calling to Marshall and Yeates, who were beginning a little ascent, to “pull
up." This "they did so briskly that immediately upon his saying the time was
out, Marshall clasped his arms, about a sapling to support himself," and
declared “he was almost gone, and that if he had proceeded a few poles
farther he must have fallen."
.
The Indians appear to have been dissatisfied with the course from the
outset, declaring that the walk should have been made up the river, and it
is said there was a great difference of opinion upon this matter among the
settlers. One complained also of the unfitness of his shoepacks for
travelling, saying that he expected the proprietor would have made him a
present of some shoes, and at this some of the attendants, dismounting from
their horses, alternated with the savages in riding. The Lehigh was reached
about one o'clock, and after this was crossed the Indians began to look
sullen, and murmured at the rapid pace of the walkers. Several times in the
course of the afternoon they had protested against running, saying : "You
run ; that's not fair ; you was to walk." Some hours before sunset two of
them left, declaring they would go no farther with the party ; that they saw
the walkers would pass all the good land, and that they did not care how far
or where they went. It is said the third continued to near where the road
forks at Easton, where he lay down to rest, and on getting up was unable to
proceed further.
The halt that night was made within a half mile of the Indian village of
Hockyondocqua, where the shouting of the natives at a cantica could be
distinctly heard. With the morning came dull, rainy weather. It was
discovered that some of the horses had strayed away in the night, and while
some went in search of them others were sent to the village to request
Lappawinzoe, who resided there, to send other Indians to accompany the
walking party. The chief was not in a pleasant mood and declined to do so,
saying that they had got all the best of the land and they might go to the
devil for the bad. It is said that some of the natives did stroll into the
camp and take a “dram" with the whites, but they soon straggled off about
their own business.* In this way two hours or more were consumed, when, the
horses having been secured, the walk was resumed. The start was made at
eight o'clock, and for an hour the trail which had marked their course
hitherto was still followed. About nine o'clock they came upon "Captain
Harrison's" town of Pokopoghcunck, from whence the route took a
north-northwest direction through the woods, Marshall now carrying the
compass by which he held his course. While crossing Big creek, at the foot
of the mountains, Yeates staggered and fell, but
* In Smith's account it is said that one of the Indians of the first
day's walk joined the party with two others and continued with them for
eight or Ben miles, when the rain increasing they retired. Joseph Knowles
says two of the three Indians that walked the day before came and travelled
two or three miles, and then left much dissatisfied.
Page 163
Marshall pushing on, followed by Alexander Brown with watch in hand, and
Enoch Pearson, both mounted, ended the journey on the north side of the
Pocono or Broad mountain at precisely two o'clock. Of Yeates, Smith says he
became "lame and tired," but he appeared to have been less distressed by the
first day's work than Marshall, and all the circumstances tend to confirm
the statements of Brown and Heider that he "drank rather too much" of the
varied store of liquors provided.
The various estimates of the distance accomplished in this eighteen-hour
walk differ widely, but accepting the survey of Chapman to the Kittatinny
range, and Marshall's estimate of twenty miles beyond this point to the
finish, the total is found to be a little more than sixty-eight miles, which
is about an average of the different estimates and probably nearer the
truth. In the condition of the country, this was a remarkable performance ;
and considering the absence of bridges, the uneven character of the route,
and the steady, constant tramp required, it is not astonishing that two of
the three athletic woodsmen broke down under the severe strain. The terminus
of the walk was marked by placing stones in the forks of five chestnut oak
trees, and from thence the surveyors proceeded at once to perform their part
of the general task. And here the convenient blank in the deed allowed the
surveyor to put the proprietor's construction upon the course to be followed
toward the Delaware. Eastburn and his assistants accordingly ran a "right
line" instead of one parallel with the base and the shortest route to the
river, and after four days' work in a barren, mountainous region, reached
the Delaware near the mouth of Shohola creek.
There is something of poetic justice in the result of this walk to some
of those interested in it. Though frequently promised, the five hundred
acres were never laid off to Marshall; Eastburn was subsequently repudiated
by Thomas Penn, and his heirs notified "that they need not expect the least
favor ;" and the proprietor, brought before the king by the indignant
people, was forced to dissemble and disown his own acts and agents in a
painfully humiliating manner. But all this did not repair the injury
inflicted upon the Indians, nor avert the vengeance which the folly of Penn
brought upon the province. Before the members of the "walking" party reached
their homes they saw striking evidences of the deep feeling of
dissatisfaction existing among the Indians, and made it a frequent topic of
conversation on the return journey. Some two months later Marshall was at
Hockyondocqua, where he met Lappawinzoe and Tishecunk. The natives were loud
in their complaints of the way in which the walk was performed, one old
Indian expressing his disgust with- "No sit down to smoke-no shoot squirrel;
but lun, lun, lun, all day long." The chief was equally dissatisfied with
the manner of the walk and the course. Next May, he said, we will go to
Philadelphia, each one with a buckskin, to repay the presents, and take the
land back again.
Page 164
Unfortunately such a solution of the difficulty was not practicable. The
lands previously sold to speculators at once came into market, and the
natives found the settlers taking up their lands even about their villages.
The Indians refused to vacate their lands and continued their remonstrances,
until despairing of redress in this way, they procured letters written to
the governor and "Mr. Langhorne, a magistrate of Bucks, in which they
treated the proprietors with a great deal of freedom, remonstrated against
the injustice that was done them, and declared their resolution of
maintaining the possession of their lands by force of arms. "This thoroughly
alarmed the provincial authorities, who in 1741 had recourse to the Six
Nations. Shikelemy, an aboriginal viceroy stationed at Shamokin, was sent to
the confederation with a pressing invitation to send deputies to
Philadelphia, and in the summer of 1742 two hundred and thirty of their
leading men came to the seat of government. The Delawares were also summoned
and the matter brought before the conference for decision. The provincial
authorities stated their case, laying especial stress upon the insolence of
the Delawares in writing letters " wherein they had abused the worthy
proprietaries, and treated them with the utmost rudeness and ill-manners."
The finding of the Iroquois was a foregone conclusion. They had sold
their pretended claim to the region, they were flattered by the invitation
to act as arbitrators, and they could satisfy their vindictive hatred
without personal cost. They promptly decided, therefore, in favor of the
whites, and in a most insolent speech bade the betrayed natives to remove
either to Wyoming or Shamokin. Beset before and behind, the remnant of
Delawares and Shawanese had no other course to pursue than to obey, a part
continuing their journey to Ohio.
The expanding settlements still kept in advance of the Indian boundary
line, and the demand for more room soon began to be urgently pressed. In
1749 a further cession of land was secured from the natives, the
representatives of the Six Nations uniting with chiefs of the Shamokin,
Delaware, and Shawanese occupants, on August 22, in a deed granting the
region north of the Kittatinny range on the east side of the Susquehanna,
within the following limits: Beginning on the river at the nearest mountains
north of the Mahanoy creek, and from thence extending by a direct line to
the main branch of the Delaware at the north side of the Lackawaxen. Much of
this region had already been pre-empted by adventurous squatters, while west
of the Susquehanna the line of settlements was scarcely less advanced,
although the purchase line on this side was still marked by the Blue hills.
In 1753 the increased activity .of the French in the-valley of the Ohio
began to create concern for the safety of the frontier. The enemy's agents
were known to be actively engaged in seducing the natives from their
allegiance to the English; the Shawanese had yielded to their blandishments,
and the Dela-
Page 165
wares and Iroquois were known to be wavering. A general conference of
representatives from the threatened colonies was called to meet at Albany,
and to this the Iroquois were also invited. The meeting occurred in 1754,
and on July 6th the representatives of Pennsylvania secured a deed from the
Indians for all the land within the state southwest of a line beginning one
mile above the mouth of Penn's creek, and running thence "northwest and by
west as far as the province of Pennsylvania extends, to its western lines or
boundaries." In determining this line, however, it was found to strike the
northern boundary a short distance west of the Conewango creek. The lands of
the Shawanese, Delaware, and Monsey occupants were thus "sold from under
their feet" contrary to the express stipulation of the Six Nations to these
tribes. Nothing further was needed to completely alienate these savages, and
but little more to precipitate them into a cruel and relentless war upon the
defenseless frontiers.
The defeat of Braddock, in 1755, decided the last waverer, and the
border, from the Delaware to the Allegheny, was at once ravaged with
tomahawk and fire-brand. On October 18th a party of Indians attacked the
settlers on Penn's creek, and carried off twenty-five persons, after burning
and otherwise destroying the improvements. Five days later a company of
forty-six men from Paxton creek, led by John Harris, went to Shamokin to
inquire of the Indians there who the authors of the devastation were. On
their return, while crossing Mahanoy creek, they were ambushed by hostile
savages; four were killed by the enemy, four were drowned, and the rest put
to flight. These incidents inspired the pioneers in this region with such
terror of the savages that all the settlements between Shamokin and Hunter's
mill, a space of fifty miles along the Susquehanna, were deserted. On the
13th of December, Weiser reported to the provincial government that the
country about Reading was in a dismal condition. Consternation, poverty, and
confusion were everywhere apparent, with the prospect that the settlements
would soon be abandoned. On the l6th, reports from Bethlehem and Nazareth
gave account of two hundred savages invading Northampton county, murdering
the inhabitants and burning their dwellings. On Christmas, reports were
received from Conrad Weiser, who had been sent to Harris's ferry and who had
gone thence up the west branch of the Susquehanna, that the Delawares at
Nescopec had given that place to the French for a rendezvous, and frequent
collisions had occurred between the hostile Indians and the white rangers.
On the same day a letter from Easton conveyed the doleful tidings that above
the town for fifty miles the improvements were generally destroyed and the
settlers fled. In the neighborhood of Dupue's place five families only
formed an exception. The enemy made but few prisoners, slaughtering men,
women, and children alike. On the 31st, it was reported that during the
current month the Indians had burned fifty houses, murdered above one
hundred persons, and were " still continuing their ravages, murders, and
devastations."
Page 166
Happily, Bucks county was never called upon to resist the ravages of an
Indian war in her own borders, but her citizens responded none the less
promptly to the call of her suffering neighbors. The event of hostilities
from a foreign source had been anticipated in the county for some years. In
the latter part of 1747 two hundred and sixty citizens of Philadelphia
formed a military association for the purpose of placing the city in a
posture of defense, and had proposed to erect batteries and supply an
armament for the protection of the city against a naval attack. They
appealed to the assembly and the proprietors for countenance and support,
and got very little of either. On New Years day however, eleven companies
paraded in public, and the governor issued commissions to their chosen
officers. This spirit extended to the surrounding country, and by the latter
part of May, 1748, Bucks had eleven "associated" companies organized into a
regiment under command of Colonel Alexander Graydon. "The companies were
organized with respect to township lines, were subject to no discipline,
save such as they voluntarily adopted, and were formally recognized by the
provincial authorities so far only as to grant commissions to the officers.
Although freedom from imminent danger by way of the river tended to diminish
the military ardor of the associators, these organizations were still
maintained until the ominous murmurs of the Indians supplied a new
incentive, and when these murmurs gave place to actual hostilities the
associators were promptly heard urging the more effective organization of a
regular militia. †
* The following officers were commissioned by the governor on February
12, 1748 :-
CAPTAINS. LIEUTENANTS. ENSIGNS.
Alexander Graydon, Anthony Denormandie, James Barber,
Joseph Inslee, Anthony Teate, David Lowell,
Langhorne Biles, Garret Vansant, John Severns,
George Bennett, Garret Wynkoop, Ralph Dunn,
Richard Walker. Robert Walker. William Davis.
On May 25th, the following :-
Charles Stewart, James Hart, William Hart,
Ahthony Wright, Lewis Rue, Richard Vanhorne,
Robert Jemmison, John Beard, Samuel Martin,
James McLaughlin, James Davis, John Hall,
John Wilson, Thomas Blair, George Overpack,
Bernard Vanhorne, Jr. Robert Cummings. Ralph Dunn.
The last-named company officers lost their commissions on the 12th of the
following
month, as they had withdrawn from the Northampton company, a fact not
known to the
governor when he issued the commissions.
† On November 4, 1756, there were nine associated companies, with
the following
officers : -
CAPTAINS. LIEUTENANTS. ENSIGNS.
Alexander Graydon. Matthias Keen. John Priestly.
Sergeants, 2. Private men, 50.
William Ramsay. John Johnson. John Adams.
Sergeants, 2. Private men, 56.
Page 167 Photo Fellman, Charles
Page 168 Blank
Page 169
On November 12, 1755, certain citizens of Philadelphia appealed to the
assembly declaring that at a time when a bold and barbarous enemy had
advanced within about a hundred miles of the metropolis, carrying murder and
desolation along with them; when the country is already stained with blood,
and upwards of a thousand families dispersed over the province, the only
security of the people is in an established militia. At the same time the
Friends deprecated all such suggestions and formally expressed apprehensions
that "many among us will be under the necessity of suffering rather than
consenting thereto by the payment of a tax for such purposes." Reports of
savage hostilities and appeals for help continued to come in, and the
assembly, divided in its sense of duty, finally struck a compromise. On the
17th of November, a bill was presented, in which it was shown that a
majority of the legislative body were Friends and conscientiously opposed to
war, but as it appeared from certain letters received, that the Indians had
passed the Blue mountains, had broke into the county of Berks and were then
committing murder, devastation, and other kind of horrid mischief, and that
many of other religious faith had come into the province, to whom warlike
operations were not obnoxious, it was deemed best to recognize and employ
the companies formed and to be hereafter formed. This bill, however, only
made it lawful for the freemen of the province to form themselves into
companies and organize as it was customary for a militia to do. No youth
under age, nor any bought or indented servant was to be admitted. No
definite term of service was fixed, and it was provided that none should be
compelled nor led to go more than three days' journey beyond the inhabited
part of the province, nor detained in garrison longer than three weeks,
without the written consent of volunteers. Practically, the law simply
recognized the associators, and permitted the government to employ them in
resisting the inroads of the savages.
The massacre at Gnadenhutten occurred on the 24th of November; the
CAPTAINS. . LIEUTENANTS. ENSIGNS
Henry Creusen. Josiah Vansant. Andrew Van Bockerk
Sergeants, 2. Private men, 50.
Henry Scott. Garrett Wynkoop. Lufford Laflordson
Sergeants, 2. Private men, 74.
Jacob Orndt. Anthony Miller. Nicholas Conrade.
Sergeants, 2. Private men, 33
. Joseph Inslee. John Zuber. Joseph Inslee, Jr
Sergeants, 2. Private men, 62.
Anthony Teate. Robert Cummings. James Cummings
Sergeants, 2. Private men, 40.
Jonathan Palmer Luther Calvin. Thompson Price.
. . . . . . . . Private men, 108.
Charles Stewart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Private men, 40
10
Page 170.
report of it came to Philadelphia on the day following, and on the 26th,
Captain Wilson with a company of sixty or seventy men started for the scene
of hostilities. They reached Bethlehem that night, and on the following
morning proceeded toward the mountains, but found the enemy had gone. It is
probable that this company went to the support of the frontier settlements
upon its own motion, and returned when no immediate occasion for active
service was found. But the provincial authorities felt the necessity of
providing some systematic defense of the frontier, and under the authority
of the bill mentioned to take certain of the associated companies into the
pay of the province. By the, first of February, 1756, some eight hundred men
were thus mustered into the provincial service, under the immediate command
of Benjamin Franklin, who, as colonel of one of the Philadelphia regiments
and one of the provincial commissioners for frontier defense, was given
charge of the defensive operations from the Delaware to the Susquehanna.
The first contribution to this force from Bucks county was the company of
Captain James McLaughlin. It was formally mustered* on the 29th of December,
but it was not until the 5th of January following that it received orders to
march. The captain was then directed by the governor to detach the
lieutenant with twenty men of his company to await in readiness for orders
from Benjamin Franklin, and with the remaining thirty to march at once for
Harris's ferry. None of the other associated companies of the county appear
to have offered their services at this time, and, as the province was still
in urgent need of troops, a Captain Hays, who commanded a small company on
the frontier, came to Bucks county to secure recruits. He was accompanied by
the Reverend Charles Beatty, then pastor of the Neshaminy church, but who
had gone to the frontier with Wilson's company and remained behind. Hays met
with ill success for a time, and on January 14, 1756, Franklin wrote the
governor from Bethlehem : "As Hays, I hear, is not likely to soon recruit
his company, I have ordered Orndt to come up from Rockland in Bucks county
to strengthen this part of the province." † But Mr. Beatty appears to have
been of that class of
* The following muster-roll, subscribed by the members of this company,
suggests the military discipline of the period and the terms upon which the
troops served the province :-
" We, the subscribers, do hereby engage ourselves to serve as soldiers in
His Majesty's service under the command of Captain James McLaughlin for the
space of two months, and whoever of us shall desert or prove cowardly in
time of action, or disobedient to our officers, shall forfeit his Pay. This
agreement we make in consideration of being allowed, at the rate of Six
Dollars per month, Arms, Ammunition, Blankets, Provisions, and a gill of rum
per day for each man. The Blankets, Arms, and Ammunition left to be returned
when we are discharged from the service."
† This company served in Northampton county in building forts and
subsequently as a garrison. How long it served cannot be definitely
determined. It was first stationed at Fort Norris, on Big creek, within the
present limits of Monroe county. On October 8,
Page 171
fighting parsons of which the revolutionary period subsequently produced
so many examples, and learning of the captain's difficulty determined to
present the subject to his people from the pulpit. Meeting the officer one
day he invited him to be present at church on the following Sunday, when, at
the close of his service, he addressed his people somewhat as follows: "The
savages have attacked the frontier settlements, and are murdering our
fellow-citizens. The governor has made a call for volunteers to march with a
view to attack and drive them back, but I regret to learn that it is not
very promptly met. It is certainly somebody's duty to go, and I have
determined, if the synod allows me, to offer my services as chaplain, and
thus do my part. Of course, it will be very pleasant for me to have the
company of any of the congregation or my neighbors who may feel it their
duty to go." The response to this appeal was of the most practical
character. In a short time forty-five men joined Captain Hays's standard,
and proceeded to Bethlehem. A few days later it was stationed near the
Lehigh gap, and on the 10th of January, with the detachment from
McLaughlin's company, Orndt's company, and other troops, marched to a point
opposite Gnadenhutten, where they built Fort Allen. Hays's company was
employed in conveying trains for a time, and was subsequently stationed at
the Lehigh gap or below this point at Fort Brown.
In January ninety-five regulars had come from New York and been placed in
garrison at Reading and Easton. In March these troops were ordered to
return, and the governor, finding it necessary to take another company of
fifty men into the pay of the service, directed Colonel Clapham, on the 8th
instant, to proceed to Newtown, inspect the company of Captain Inslee there,
and if found satisfactory to muster it into the provincial service. This was
accordingly done, when the captain with his ensign and twenty-five men was
ordered to Easton, and the lieutenant with the other twenty-five was ordered
to Reading. The latter detachment is heard of no more, but, on the 25th of
June, the first named is reported by the "Cornmiss' Gen' of ye Musters" as
still at Easton. In this report of his tour of inspection the commissary
says :
" At six came to Easton, found Ensign Inslee of Captain Inslee's company
with twenty-four men ; he told me the captain was gone to Philadelphia for
the company's pay, and one man absent, sick at Bethlehem. Provincial stores,
twenty-five good muskets, twenty-five cartouche boxes with eleven rounds
each, fifteen blankets.”
" 26 June. -At nine A. M. mustered the company stationed here, found them
stout, able men ; their arms in good order; they fired at a mark, sixteen of
twenty hit within nine inches of the centre at eighty yards distance. The
ensign had no certificates of enlistment, but told me that Colonel Clapham
had carried them with him."
1756, it was transferred to Fort Allen, on the Lehigh, a little below
Mauch Chunk, and is there lost sight of in the records. Captain Orndt
remained in the service until the end of the French war, reaching the rank
of major, and in the summer of 1758 was placed in command of the eastern
frontier with headquarters at Easton.
Page 172
It is believed that Captain "Jemmison's" company was taken into the pay
of the province, and stationed at Hunter's Fort, but nothing further can be
learned of it. In 1758 the company of Richard Walker was summoned to assist
in the campaign which General Forbes was then preparing against Fort
Duquesne. A staff officer wrote the captain, under date of June 5th, from
Philadelphia : "It is General Forbes's order that you get your company armed
and accoutred here, and then to march without loss of time to Lancaster,
where you will wait to receive further orders." It is probable that the
company went no further, and served as a general protection to Forbes's
flank as he proceeded westward.
The service on the eastern frontier, where Bucks county was principally
represented, consisted chiefly of garrison duty and ranging, with frequent
details to guard settlers while harvesting their crops. There were no
expeditions, no pitched battles with the enemy, and the troops from this
county, while doing their duty well, did not figure conspicuously in the
records.
The military policy which dictated the operations in the southwest during
the years 1755-8 aimed at the reduction of the French and Indians'
stronghold at the forks of the Ohio, assured that if this was accomplished
the frontiers of Pennsylvania would need no surer defense. But the defeat of
Braddock demonstrated that such an event had not been provided for, and the
unprotected frontiers were found defenseless against the terrible onslaught
which the savages made in the succeeding fall. The unfortunate bickerings of
the proprietors and the assembly even then delayed the needed measures for
defense until the Indians had depopulated the settlements above the Blue
hills, and were pressing their victorious way into the heart of the
province. Among the last acts of Governor Morris's administration was the
declaration of war against the savages, in spite of a general protest from
the Friends. This was adopted by his successor, who, aided by Benjamin
Franklin, employed the most vigorous measures for defense.
Bounties were offered for prisoners and for scalps of men, women, and
children of the enemy; a chain of block-houses was stretched along the
Kittatinny hills from the Delaware to the Maryland line, and each garrisoned
with twenty to seventy-five men. But by far the most effective in its
results was an expedition, concerted in 1756, against Kittanning--an Indian
stronghold on the Allegheny river. The movement, under the direction of
General Armstrong, was entirely successful, and resulted in the complete
disorganization of the Indian conspiracy against the frontier.
The savages were once more willing to treat, and a grand council was
convened at Easton in November of this year. The high contracting parties
were Governor Denny, on the part of the province, and Teedyuscung, on the
part of the natives. Each leader was accompanied by a considerable retinue,
the whites making special effort to impose upon the imagination of the
Indians by
Page 173
the bravery of their martial display. A previous council had been held in
July, but the attendance was small, and neither party was fully prepared to
join issue. The more important business was therefore deferred until autumn.
Meanwhile Armstrong's expedition had occurred, and the second meeting found
the two parties ready to discuss their grievances. When questioned as to the
cause of the dissatisfaction and hostility of the Indians, the eminent chief
mentioned the overtures of the French and the ill usage of the provincial
authorities. He boldly declared that the very land on which they stood had
been taken from the rightful owners by fraud ; and not only had the country
from the Tohickon creek to Wyoming been thus taken, but several tracts in
New Jersey had been similarly stolen from his people. And, subsequently,
when the Six Nations had given them and the Shawanese the country on the
Juniata for a hunting-ground, with the full knowledge of the governor, the
latter permitted settlers to encroach upon their lands. Again, in 1754, the
governor had gone to Albany to purchase more lands of the Six Nations,
describing the lands sought by points of compass, which the Indians did not
understand, and, by the profusion of presents, obtained grants for lands
which the Iroquois did not intend to sell, including not only the Juniata,
but also the west branch of the Susquehanna. When these things were known to
the native occupants, they declared they would no longer be friends with the
English, who were trying to get all of their country.
This council lasted nine days, and resulted in a treaty of peace between
the two parties. Compensation was offered for the lands taken by the
“walking purchase," but this matter was deferred until those especially
interested could be present. A council for this purpose was accordingly
convened in July, 1757, when the whites resorted to a practice too common
with them in such conferences. Rum was freely supplied, and strenuous
efforts made to place Teedyuscung hopelessly under its influence. Through
the aid of certain Quakers present this was prevented, and the whole
settlement finally referred to the king and council in England. In the
succeeding year another grand council was held at Easton for the adjustment
of the whole question of Indian grievances, and representatives of the Six
Nations, Delawares, Shawanese, Miamis, Mohicans, Monseys, Nanticokes, Conoys,
etc., were present to the number of five hundred. The Iroquois had taken
great offense on account of the independent treaty made by the Delawares and
Shawanese in 1756, and had committed sundry outrages upon the settlements in
the hope of embroiling the adjoining tribes with the whites. In this
conference, also, they took great offense because of the prominence assumed
by the Delaware chieftain, and it was only through the earnest efforts of
the Quakers present that rum and intrigue with the representatives of the
Six Nations did not defeat the purposes of the conference. Teedyuscung,
however, bore himself with dignity and firmness, and secured from the
governors of Pennsylvania and New Jersey and the
Page 174
principal Indian agents, who represented the whites, a release of all
lands beyond the Allegheny mountains, purchased in 1754, and the lands on
the "west branch." For the remainder the Indians gave a deed confirming the
former purchase, and more clearly defining its boundaries, for which they
received additional compensation.